7:32
WikiLeaks & The Middle East Peace Process (24-Jan-11)(GLOBAL FOCUS series - Middle East)
WikiLeaks & The Middle East Peace Process (24-Jan-11)(GLOBAL FOCUS series - Middle East)
The 'REVOLUTION' may not be 'TELEVISED' - but if 'YOU SEARXCH' you will 'SEE' it on 'YOUTUBE' - use it before they 'PULL IT'... *For 'QUALITY INFORMATION' (QI), videos, news and features contained in our Associate Channels and Digital Information Platforms, Google 'yousearxch-' (followed by 'name' or 'series title') for a 'global search' or click on 'yousearxch' tag, for YouTube only search. TheYouArchive2011
8:29
Gideon Levy on Peace Process Game (10-Oct-10)(GLOBAL FOCUS series)
Gideon Levy on Peace Process Game (10-Oct-10)(GLOBAL FOCUS series)
*Formore detailed 'INFORMATION' or 'SEARCH' on the 'AUTHOR', 'SUBJECT' and 'RELATED TOPICS' use our 'YOUSEARXCH' facility - Google - TheYouArchive2010- followed by - the authors 'NAME'/'TITLE' or - 'SERIES' title. *For 'QUALITY INFORMATION' (QI), videos, news and features contained in our Associate Channels and Digital Information Platforms, Google 'yousearxch' for a 'global search' or click on 'yousearxch' tag, for YouTube only search. TheYouArchive2010
4:38
Amb. Dore Gold on BBC World Debate on Peace Process
Amb. Dore Gold on BBC World Debate on Peace Process
Amb. Dore Gold joins Dr. Husan Zomlot of the Fatah International Relations Committee and Khalid Abdula-Janahi of the Global Agenda Council, Middle East for a debate about the roles of the players in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the BBC World Debate in Marrakech, Morocco, October 2010.
10:57
Exploring the Metrics of Peace: Process and Conceptual Aspects of GPI
Exploring the Metrics of Peace: Process and Conceptual Aspects of GPI
Exploring the Metrics of Peace: How Might the Global Peace Index Be Utilized?
8:45
Interesting moments from LSE's "The Goldstone Report and the Peace Process" panel
Interesting moments from LSE's "The Goldstone Report and the Peace Process" panel
- ****************************** At 5:16 Travers is asked about an interview he gave and whether the implication of what he said was antisemitic. Note how he chooses not to refute this at all, preferring not to answer the question to explain and clear this allegation at this public meeting. ****************************** The Brahimi Panels: The Goldstone Report and the Peace Process LSE Global Governance public discussion Speakers: Ami Ayalon, Professor Christine Chinkin, Karma Nabulsi, Colonel Desmond Travers Chair: Lakhdar Brahimi Find out more about the Goldstone report here: goldstonereport.org
22:23
Riz Khan - RE-STARTING THE STALLED MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS
Riz Khan - RE-STARTING THE STALLED MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS
Contentious final status issues holding back peace between Israelis and Palestinians - such as the question of Jerusalem as a capital and the future of Israeli settlements in the occupied territories - are once again flaring up. Several thousand Israeli settlers demonstrated recently in Jerusalem, denouncing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a perceived lack of support in ordering a freeze on some settlement building a few weeks ago. Israeli leaders are also displeased with a recent European Union document suggesting that East Jerusalem should be the capital of a future Palestinian state. Is the US on the right track with its policy on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process? US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton talks with Riz about the approach she will take to get things moving again in the region. And joining Riz to discuss Secretary Clintons comments is former US ambassador Philip Wilcox, president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace, and Daniel Levy, director of the Middle East Initiative at the New America Foundation.
45:21
Corona and the Peace Process
Corona and the Peace Process
Global News Network; Talk to Harry, Host: Harry Tambuatco (on Leave) Co-Host: Dr. John Ortiz Teope Guest: Atty, Alexander Padilla, EVP/COO PhilHealth, and Chairman, Government Peace Negotiation Panel Aired: February 6, 2012
4:55
Proud to be part of peace process
Proud to be part of peace process
hey, This is a video based of famous Tamil songs.. lets be together to keep the people's rights and peace remain in the part of global
17:12
William Sieghart: US policy curtails progress in the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
William Sieghart: US policy curtails progress in the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
William Sieghart speaks in favour of the motion "The best chance for peace between Israel and Palestine is for Uncle Sam to butt out" at Cadogan Hall on 27th February 2012. Event info: Is it surprising that the Israelis and Palestinians are still unable to come to some sort of agreement? After all if the adjudicator in a mediation is firmly on your side why bother to concede anything to the enemy? Conversely, why accept anything proposed by the adjudicator if you know his affections are biased towards the other side? We know America's neutrality is hopelessly compromised on this issue and it doesn't pretend otherwise. Say something against Israel in the run-up to the US presidential elections and you won't become president. And since that's not going to change, the best thing one can hope is for America to simply withdraw from the peace process. Or is it? Some have faith that Washington can be persuaded to adopt a more flexible and even-handed stance -- that it can free itself from the influence of the hard-liners and be responsive to more liberal voices: the voice of the Jewish American lobby group J-Street, for example, whose president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, is one of the participants in this debate. For if America were not involved -- if the most important global playmaker were excluded or pulled out of the negotiating process -- then negotiations would become a charade; the power to force through compromises and enforce them will have gone. Uncle Sam may be a troublesome <b>...</b>
76:21
The Peace Process in Nepal: Is It Failing? Part 1 | The New School
The Peace Process in Nepal: Is It Failing? Part 1 | The New School
Study international affairs at the Milano School of International Affairs, Management, and Urban Policy, a part of The New School in New York City. | www.newschool.edu Join Ian Martin, former UN envoy to Nepal, as he discusses the fragile peace process in that country. The peace process has been hailed as an unusual success story for being achieved by Nepali actors rather than the international community. But with the deadline for agreement on a new constitution fast approaching and the Maoist army still in cantonments, divisions among political parties threaten its successful completion. Is the process failing? Ian Martin is former special representative of the secretary-general and was head of the United Nations Mission in Nepal until February 2009, having served there since May 2005, first as representative of the high commissioner for human rights and then as personal representative of the secretary-general for support to the peace process. Additional remarks will be made by New School professor Andrew Arato and Deepak Thapa from the Social Science Baha in Nepal. INDIA CHINA INSTITUTE | www.newschool.edu * Location: Orozco Room, Alvin Johnson/JM Kaplan Hall. 11/06/2009 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
42:12
The Peace Process in Nepal: Is It Failing? Part 2 | The New School
The Peace Process in Nepal: Is It Failing? Part 2 | The New School
The New School for Public Engagement is a division of The New School, a university in New York City offering distinguished graduate programs in non-profit management, urban and environmental policy, human resources, and international affairs. | www.newschool.edu Join Ian Martin, former UN envoy to Nepal, as he discusses the fragile peace process in that country. The peace process has been hailed as an unusual success story for being achieved by Nepali actors rather than the international community. But with the deadline for agreement on a new constitution fast approaching and the Maoist army still in cantonments, divisions among political parties threaten its successful completion. Is the process failing? Ian Martin is former special representative of the secretary-general and was head of the United Nations Mission in Nepal until February 2009, having served there since May 2005, first as representative of the high commissioner for human rights and then as personal representative of the secretary-general for support to the peace process. Additional remarks will be made by New School professor Andrew Arato and Deepak Thapa from the Social Science Baha in Nepal. INDIA CHINA INSTITUTE | www.newschool.edu * Location: Orozco Room, Alvin Johnson/JM Kaplan Hall. 11/06/2009 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
3:11
Introduction: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
Introduction: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
Chair Jonathan Freed;and introduces the motion "The best chance for peace between Israel and Palestine is for Uncle Sam to butt out" at Cadogan Hall on 27th February 2012. Event info: Is it surprising that the Israelis and Palestinians are still unable to come to some sort of agreement? After all if the adjudicator in a mediation is firmly on your side why bother to concede anything to the enemy? Conversely, why accept anything proposed by the adjudicator if you know his affections are biased towards the other side? We know America's neutrality is hopelessly compromised on this issue and it doesn't pretend otherwise. Say something against Israel in the run-up to the US presidential elections and you won't become president. And since that's not going to change, the best thing one can hope is for America to simply withdraw from the peace process. Or is it? Some have faith that Washington can be persuaded to adopt a more flexible and even-handed stance -- that it can free itself from the influence of the hard-liners and be responsive to more liberal voices: the voice of the Jewish American lobby group J-Street, for example, whose president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, is one of the participants in this debate. For if America were not involved -- if the most important global playmaker were excluded or pulled out of the negotiating process -- then negotiations would become a charade; the power to force through compromises and enforce them will have gone. Uncle Sam may be a troublesome <b>...</b>
16:50
Summations and final vote: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process
Summations and final vote: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process
www.intelligencesquared.com Event info: Is it surprising that the Israelis and Palestinians are still unable to come to some sort of agreement? After all if the adjudicator in a mediation is firmly on your side why bother to concede anything to the enemy? Conversely, why accept anything proposed by the adjudicator if you know his affections are biased towards the other side? We know America's neutrality is hopelessly compromised on this issue and it doesn't pretend otherwise. Say something against Israel in the run-up to the US presidential elections and you won't become president. And since that's not going to change, the best thing one can hope is for America to simply withdraw from the peace process. Or is it? Some have faith that Washington can be persuaded to adopt a more flexible and even-handed stance -- that it can free itself from the influence of the hard-liners and be responsive to more liberal voices: the voice of the Jewish American lobby group J-Street, for example, whose president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, is one of the participants in this debate. For if America were not involved -- if the most important global playmaker were excluded or pulled out of the negotiating process -- then negotiations would become a charade; the power to force through compromises and enforce them will have gone. Uncle Sam may be a troublesome relative, but you'll get nowhere without him.
21:34
Questions: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
Questions: Uncle Sam should butt out of the Israel-Palestine peace process - IQ2 debates
www.intelligencesquared.com From the debate "The best chance for peace between Israel and Palestine is for Uncle Sam to butt out" at Cadogan Hall on 27th February 2012. Event info: Is it surprising that the Israelis and Palestinians are still unable to come to some sort of agreement? After all if the adjudicator in a mediation is firmly on your side why bother to concede anything to the enemy? Conversely, why accept anything proposed by the adjudicator if you know his affections are biased towards the other side? We know America's neutrality is hopelessly compromised on this issue and it doesn't pretend otherwise. Say something against Israel in the run-up to the US presidential elections and you won't become president. And since that's not going to change, the best thing one can hope is for America to simply withdraw from the peace process. Or is it? Some have faith that Washington can be persuaded to adopt a more flexible and even-handed stance -- that it can free itself from the influence of the hard-liners and be responsive to more liberal voices: the voice of the Jewish American lobby group J-Street, for example, whose president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, is one of the participants in this debate. For if America were not involved -- if the most important global playmaker were excluded or pulled out of the negotiating process -- then negotiations would become a charade; the power to force through compromises and enforce them will have gone. Uncle Sam may be a troublesome <b>...</b>
6:17
Peace Is A Process Of Empowerment, Quality Of Life And Prosperity
Peace Is A Process Of Empowerment, Quality Of Life And Prosperity
The 7 wealthiest people in the world have more than the bottom 1 billion. Those 1 billion people are excluded from participating in the global economy. Gill Wallace Hope has listened to thousands of the poor in 40 countries, understanding their challenges and planning new economic systems for them to participate in the green economy.







